Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu swiftly rejected claims that Israel has agreed to grant the Palestinian Authority (PA) administrative control over the Rafah border crossing between Gaza and Egypt. The allegations, initially published by the prominent Arabic-language newspaper Asharq Al-Awsat on Wednesday, suggested a trilateral agreement involving Israel, Egypt, and the Palestinian Authority. However, Netanyahu labeled the report as an effort by the PA to "create a false picture" regarding its influence over the crossing.
The Controversial Report
According to Asharq Al-Awsat, the heads of Israel's Mossad and Shin Bet security agency, alongside Egyptian intelligence chief Hassan Rashad, reached an agreement to allow the PA to manage the Palestinian side of the Rafah crossing under United Nations supervision. The alleged deal also reportedly included provisions for future revisions to the Agreement on Movement and Access, an international framework governing mobility in and out of Gaza.
However, sources monitoring the ceasefire implementation clarified that while discussions occurred, no timeline for any transfer of control or reopening of the crossing has been finalized. They further highlighted that disputes over the nearby Philadelphi Corridor—critical for security operations along the Gaza-Egypt border—remain unresolved.
#BREAKING: @netanyahu's office says #Palestinian authority creates false impression that it controls #Rafah crossing https://t.co/y3GHTUHyoL pic.twitter.com/37nnRuNbya
— Arab News (@arabnews) January 22, 2025
Netanyahu’s Firm Rebuttal
Netanyahu unequivocally dismissed the report. "IDF forces are positioned around the crossing, and there is no passage without Israeli security’s explicit approval," the Prime Minister declared. He added that the PA's involvement is limited to stamping passports under existing international arrangements. This administrative role, Netanyahu emphasized, is merely a technical formality enabling Gazans to travel abroad.
The Shin Bet echoed Netanyahu’s stance, stating that operations at the Rafah crossing are being managed "in accordance with agreements approved by Israel's political leadership." The agency refuted claims suggesting a substantial shift in administrative authority.
Israeli sources are already denying that there will be any Palestinian Authority presence at the Rafah border crossing.
— Michael (@novussubsole) January 22, 2025
As I said, Netanyahu won't honor his word. However, once he is forced to leave office, things will improve greatly. https://t.co/MfRir1Q9UF
Philadelphi Corridor and Broader Implications
Complicating the issue is the Philadelphi Corridor, the strategic buffer zone separating Gaza from Egypt. Disputes between Israel and Egypt over control and security measures in this area have stalled progress. While Israel has reportedly proposed partial withdrawals, Egypt has demanded a full return to pre-conflict conditions. Sources familiar with the negotiations characterized these disagreements as "technical and logistical" but stressed that solutions are being actively pursued.
The Corridor's significance extends beyond military strategy; it symbolizes broader geopolitical dynamics involving Egypt, Israel, and Gaza. A resolution to the corridor dispute could reshape security and humanitarian access in the region.
đź”´
— Voice From The East (@EasternVoices) January 22, 2025
Saudi report: The heads of Mossad and Shin Bet reached an agreement with the Egyptian intelligence chief - the Palestinian Authority will manage the Palestinian side of the Rafah crossing, under UN supervision. pic.twitter.com/O6bhJ2EMFO
Ceasefire Talks: Temporary or Transformative?
Observers suggest that ongoing discussions surrounding Rafah and related security arrangements are primarily focused on maintaining the fragile ceasefire. "All agreements related to the ceasefire are temporary measures tailored to the current phase," one source explained, noting the inherent instability of the situation. The possibility of revising long-standing agreements, such as the Agreement on Movement and Access, further underscores the fluidity of the region’s geopolitical landscape.
Uncertainty and Speculation
The report from Asharq Al-Awsat has fueled speculation about broader regional implications. Some analysts view the alleged negotiations as indicative of a renewed push by Egypt and the international community to empower the PA, thereby weakening Hamas’ grip on Gaza. Others argue that the report is part of a disinformation campaign aimed at complicating Israel's security posture.
Netanyahu’s strong denial highlights Israel’s reluctance to cede control over critical infrastructure and its insistence on maintaining a robust security framework around Gaza. Meanwhile, Egyptian demands and PA aspirations continue to create friction in the delicate balance of power.
Palestinian Authority reportedly to manage Gaza's Rafah crossing under UN supervision https://t.co/CDduAqDoXp
— Ynetnews (@ynetnews) January 22, 2025
As the situation unfolds, the international community remains focused on Rafah as a critical access point for humanitarian aid and a potential cornerstone for any lasting peace agreement. However, with political posturing, unresolved disputes, and ongoing military considerations, the road ahead remains fraught with challenges.