Prime Minster Netanyahu & Vice President Kamala Harris (Office of the VPOTUS via X)

U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris and Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held what was described as a "successful" discussion. Both sides initially reported the meeting as productive and constructive, particularly in light of the current geopolitical tensions. However, the aftermath of this meeting saw an unexpected turn that left Israeli officials stunned and perplexed.

A Surprising Shift in Tone

Following the private meeting, which neither leader spoke to the press about beforehand, Vice President Harris delivered a public statement that starkly contrasted with the cooperative atmosphere reportedly experienced during the discussion. Israeli officials, who had anticipated a continuation of the amicable dialogue, were taken aback by what they perceived as a significantly harsher tone from Harris.

The disparity was highlighted by a senior Israeli official who told Axios, "The tone of her public statement was much more critical than what she conveyed to Netanyahu in the meeting."

Harris’ Public Remarks

In her statement, Harris reaffirmed Israel’s right to defend itself and condemned the brutal October 7 attack by Hamas. However, she also expressed "serious concern about the scale of human suffering in Gaza, including the death of far too many innocent civilians." This concern, articulated with vivid descriptions of "images of dead children and desperate hungry people fleeing for safety," was a departure from the expected narrative.

Harris emphasized the dire humanitarian situation in Gaza, highlighting that over two million people face high levels of food insecurity, with half a million enduring catastrophic levels. "We cannot look away in the face of these tragedies," Harris asserted. "We cannot allow ourselves to become numb to the suffering, and I will not be silent."

Diplomatic Repercussions

The reaction from Israeli officials was swift and pointed. They voiced concerns that Harris’ public criticism could jeopardize ongoing hostage deal negotiations by signaling a potential rift between Israel and the United States. "When our enemies see the U.S. and Israel are aligned, it increases the chances for a hostage deal and decreases the chances for a regional escalation," an Israeli official stated. "When there is such daylight, it pushes the deal further away and brings a regional escalation closer."

Internal Political Reactions

The response from Israeli political figures was notably intense. National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, both known for their hardline stances, vehemently criticized Harris’ comments. Ben Gvir bluntly declared, "Madam candidate, there will be no ceasefire," while Smotrich suggested that Harris' remarks unveiled a dangerous inclination towards conceding to Hamas.

Knesset Member Ohad Tal, chairman of the lobby for Israel-US relations, also weighed in, lamenting the influence of what he described as the radical wing of the Democratic Party. "The Vice President’s words after the meeting with the Prime Minister illustrate this worrying trend," Tal noted, highlighting the growing divide in U.S. political support for Israel.

A Call for Alignment

Despite the discord, Harris' aide clarified that her statement aligned with her consistent stance on the conflict: unwavering support for Israel coupled with concern for the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. This balance, the aide argued, is crucial for a realistic approach to peace and security in the region.

As diplomatic efforts continue, the recent exchange underscores the complexities and sensitivities inherent in U.S.-Israel relations. The need for clear, consistent communication between allies remains paramount to navigating the turbulent landscape of Middle Eastern geopolitics.

Sign Up For The Judean Newsletter

I agree with the Terms and conditions and the Privacy policy