Hostage Eli Sharabi is paraded on a stage by Hamas and made to give a speech before his release (Hamas video clip - Gaza Now/Telegram)
Eli Sharabi reading a Hamas prepared statement at his release (video clip)

As the first phase of the fragile ceasefire teeters on the brink of expiration, Israel and Hamas find themselves locked in a high-stakes standoff, with no clear agreement in sight for the decisive second phase. The 42-day truce, brokered through intense negotiations involving the Trump administration and key Arab mediators, is set to expire on Saturday. Yet, despite diplomatic efforts, the gap between the warring parties remains seemingly insurmountable, raising the specter of renewed conflict.

The Looming Deadline and Unresolved Tensions

The next phase of the ceasefire, a pivotal juncture in the ongoing war, is meant to facilitate the release of all remaining Israeli hostages still held by Hamas, ensure Israel’s withdrawal from Gaza, and establish a permanent cessation of hostilities. However, as the deadline approaches, neither side appears willing to concede key demands, casting doubt on the feasibility of progressing beyond this first stage.

Israel, unwavering in its resolve, has conditioned any further prisoner releases on the return of four hostages’ bodies, which it expects to receive within the next 24 hours. This follows Hamas’s egregious violations of the truce, culminating in the grotesque spectacle of forcing two hostages to witness the final prisoner release on Saturday. In retaliation, Israel halted the planned release of 602 Palestinian security prisoners, reinforcing its firm stance that compliance with agreements is non-negotiable.

Hamas’s Limited Options

Faced with mounting pressure, Hamas is left with three stark choices: surrender, disarm, and enter exile—effectively bringing the war to an end; extend the first phase of the truce with incremental hostage exchanges in return for prisoner releases and enhanced humanitarian aid; or reignite full-scale warfare. While an interview in The New York Times briefly suggested that senior Hamas leader Mousa Abu Marzouk was open to discussions on disarmament, the organization swiftly backtracked, with Hamas political bureau member Suhail al-Hindi emphatically stating: “The weapon of resistance is not open to debate or negotiation; it is sacred and cannot be relinquished.”

Contradictions and Misinformation in the Talks

As negotiations shift to Cairo, Israeli, American, and Egyptian officials await Hamas’s next move. Yet, Hamas’s rhetoric remains riddled with contradictions. While a spokesman initially suggested that hostage remains would be returned "at the right time," Saudi-based Al Arabiya contradicted this stance by reporting that Hamas had, in fact, agreed to the stipulated terms.

Despite the confusion, Israel remains resolute. Strategic Affairs Minister Ron Dermer has been working closely with U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff to lay the groundwork for upcoming discussions. However, while diplomatic channels remain active, there is no indication that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) will withdraw from the Philadelphi Corridor or the security perimeter in the foreseeable future—if ever.

The U.S. Position: Ceasefire or Escalation?

Steve Witkoff, Trump’s special envoy, has been vocal about the need for both sides to transition into the second phase of the ceasefire. Yet, in a telling shift in tone, he acknowledged on Sunday that the White House would instead push for an extension of the first phase. The Biden administration, alongside certain Israeli and Hamas officials, has hinted at supporting this measure, a move some analysts interpret as a tacit admission that hopes for a lasting peace deal remain tenuous.

Internal Divisions in the Israeli Security Establishment

The notion of resuming full-scale combat operations is facing internal pushback within Israel’s security apparatus. Some officials argue that, after 15 months of relentless bombardment, Israel has already maximized its military leverage over Hamas. Others, however, insist that an intensified offensive is necessary—not only to crush Hamas but to ensure that humanitarian aid is not being siphoned off by the terrorist organization.

Defense Minister Israel Katz has even directed the IDF to explore seizing direct control over humanitarian aid distribution—a controversial measure previously dismissed by his predecessor, Yoav Gallant, on operational and legal grounds.

Public Opinion: Israelis Demand Action

As more hostages return home, Israeli public sentiment grows increasingly impatient. A recent poll by the Israel Democracy Institute found that seven in ten Israelis support advancing to the second phase of the agreement—prioritizing the release of all captives and bringing the war to a definitive close. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu now faces mounting pressure to act decisively and deliver the results the public demands.

Is Gaza’s Dire Humanitarian Crisis Actually A Crisis?

Meanwhile, in Gaza, there are conflicting reports over how things are being seen. Many videos on Telegram show that the discontent among Palestinian civilians is rising - while on TikTok, Instagram and Facebook, many Palestinians have been posting celebratory videos of milestones like supermarkets reopening with clothing and electronic stores resuming their normal activities. One thing is for certain, the truce has failed to deliver on its promise of improved living conditions for the average Palestinian, and reconstruction remains a distant dream. While most Palestinians suffer from shortages of items like fuel and tents, Hamas operatives and officials do not seem to be subjected to the same.

Witness accounts of bulldozers entering Gaza from Egypt were met with jubilation, until it was clear that Hamas was seizing them to scoop up the ruins of their infrastructure, leaving the civilians to fend for themselves. Still, thousands of displaced residents are looking for shelter amid the ruins of northern Gaza. Many families still struggle to recover the remains of loved ones buried beneath collapsed homes, further stoking resentment against Hamas’s leadership.

In response, Hamas has shifted blame onto Israel, accusing it of violating ceasefire agreements by restricting the flow of construction materials and heavy machinery. Yet, as desperation deepens, Hamas itself faces increasing scrutiny from a war-weary population that sees little relief in sight.

Conclusion: What Lies Ahead?

With the ceasefire’s expiration looming, Israel and Hamas stand on the precipice of a critical decision. Will they forge ahead with a negotiated settlement that ensures the return of hostages and de-escalates tensions, or will the region be plunged back into all-out war?

The coming days will be decisive, as diplomatic maneuvering, military calculations, and public pressure converge in a conflict whose outcome remains uncertain. One thing is clear—neither side appears ready to blink first, and the fragile truce may be on the verge of shattering once again.

Sign Up For The Judean Newsletter

I agree with the Terms and conditions and the Privacy policy