Haaretz Chief Amos Schocken speaking in London (video snippet)

Netanyahu Government Cuts Ad & Communication Ties With Haaretz

Details
The Judean Staff
Politics

In a bold and unprecedented decision, the Israeli government has officially sanctioned the nation’s oldest and most prominent left-wing newspaper, Haaretz. The sweeping measures, endorsed unanimously by government ministers on Sunday, are being portrayed as signaling a seismic shift in the delicate relationship between media freedom and state authority in Israel. This historic move effectively blacklists Haaretz from all government communications, advertising, and funding, igniting fierce debate over the boundaries of journalism in a democracy.

The measure would likely only apply to the current government coalition as it was not brought before a full Knesset vote. The decision to not advertise with or entertain interviews from a specific media outlet is typically up the administration in power, and there has been precedent in the past where democratic governments across the world have snubbed a speficic news agency.

The Government’s Decisive Action

The initiative, championed by Communications Minister Shlomo Karhi, includes halting all government advertisements in Haaretz’s print and digital platforms and canceling subscriptions for all state employees and workers at state-owned enterprises. The minister justified the sanctions as a reaction to Haaretz’s “numerous articles that harmed the legitimacy of the State of Israel in the world and its right to self-defense.”

Karhi did not mince words in his statement, declaring, “We will not allow a reality where an official newspaper in the State of Israel advocates for sanctions against the government, supports enemies of the state, and still benefits financially from public funds.” He underscored the severity of his accusations by referencing comments made by Haaretz publisher Amos Schocken, accusing him of “supporting terrorism” and undermining Israel’s sovereignty.

The Controversial Comments That Sparked the Fallout

The controversy stems from remarks Schocken delivered at a London conference on October 27, where he criticized Prime Minister Netanyahu’s policies, particularly regarding the Palestinian territories. In his speech, Schocken accused the Israeli government of fostering “a cruel apartheid regime” and dismissed its efforts to combat what he referred to as “Palestinian freedom fighters.”

Although Schocken later clarified his comments, stating that he opposed Hamas and terrorism, the damage was done. His reference to “freedom fighters” fueled accusations that Haaretz was legitimizing violence against Israeli citizens—a claim that Schocken vehemently denies.

Haaretz: A Stalwart of Opposition or a Threat to Democracy?

Responding to the government’s actions, Haaretz issued a fiery statement accusing Netanyahu’s administration of emulating authoritarian regimes. “Like Putin, Erdoğan, and Orbán, Netanyahu is trying to silence a critical, independent newspaper. Haaretz will not bow down or transform into a government mouthpiece,” the editorial board declared.

The newspaper further accused the government of bypassing democratic norms, highlighting the lack of legal review or input from the Attorney General’s office before the resolution was passed. This procedural anomaly, according to Haaretz, is evidence of the administration’s disregard for democratic principles.

Labeling the sanctions as “opportunist” and “a direct assault on press freedom,” Haaretz positioned itself as the last bastion of independent journalism in a rapidly polarizing nation. “This is another step in Netanyahu’s journey to dismantle Israeli democracy,” the statement warned.

A Broader Pattern of Crackdowns?

This isn’t the first time Haaretz has found itself in the crosshairs of the Israeli government. Last year, Karhi introduced a similar resolution aiming to end government funding for the newspaper, although it failed to gain traction. Critics argue that this latest move represents a broader pattern of silencing dissent and consolidating control over public discourse.

For Netanyahu’s government, however, the move is framed as a necessary stand against what it views as anti-Israel propaganda disguised as journalism. “The press has a responsibility to uphold the truth and not undermine the legitimacy of the state in the international arena,” Karhi emphasized.

The Global Implications

The sanctions against Haaretz have drawn international attention, with press freedom advocates and foreign governments closely monitoring the situation. Critics argue that the move risks tarnishing Israel’s image as a vibrant democracy, while supporters contend that it’s a justified response to media overreach.

The confrontation raises profound questions about the balance between national security, freedom of the press, and the role of dissent in a democracy. As Israel grapples with internal and external challenges, this clash between the government and one of its most influential newspapers may define the country’s political and cultural trajectory for years to come.

For now, the battle lines are drawn, and the world watches as Israel navigates this extraordinary moment in its democratic history.

Sign Up For The Judean Newsletter

 I agree with the Terms and conditions and the Privacy policy

About Us

The Judean is a weekly digital blog highlighting Israel's vibrant Democracy, rich culture, and complex history. Through compelling op-eds, select news stories, our celebrated Explainers and featured articles about history, archaeology and culture, The Judean brings the real Israel into focus. 'From The River To The Sea' Israel is truly free.
Modi'in, Israel 71702
info@thejudean.com