In a daring and contentious shift that has sent shockwaves across international trade circles, Israel has recently enacted a sweeping reform of its import regulations under the audacious banner: "What’s good for Europe is good for Israel." This reform, which has been met with overwhelming approval in the Knesset, aligns Israeli import standards with those of Europe across a vast spectrum of products, ranging from food and cosmetics to electrical goods. Yet, this dramatic alignment has not gone without controversy, particularly across the Atlantic, where the United States, a stalwart ally of Israel, finds itself surprisingly sidelined.
American media outlets have been portraying an airstrike by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), which targeted and killed close to 20 high-ranking Hamas and Islamic Jihad commanders, as a callous assault on a school-turned-shelter. Reports claim the attack killed at least 100 people and injured dozens more on Saturday morning. These assertions, made moments after the strike, lack depth and context, relying on information from Gaza's civil defense—essentially Hamas.
The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have undertaken extensive measures to minimize civilian casualties during their 263-day ground operation in Gaza. Despite the complexities of urban warfare, where terrorists often embed themselves within civilian populations, the IDF has adhered to strict protocols to avoid harm to non-combatants. While many have accused Israel of conducting a genocidal war, the facts on the ground alone refute these claims. In fact, some of the world's leading warfare and international law specialists have come out applauding Israel for their "above and beyond" approach to ensuring that civilian casualties remain at a minimum.
Challenges in Urban Warfare
Hamas's strategic use of civilian areas, such as schools, hospitals, and humanitarian shelters, poses significant challenges. These tactics are in direct violation of international law, complicating the IDF's efforts to target military assets without affecting civilians. The IDF's operations in these sensitive areas underscore the need for precision and careful planning. This does not mean that no civilians are killed, sadly Hamas makes it a part of their strategy to ensure that Palestinian children and women will be among the casualties if Israel attacks these sites. However, one factor that many neglect is that many of these women and children who have been killed or inured as a result of a targeted strike on a militant compound by Israel are in fact, the families of those being targeted in the operation. From a propaganda perspective, Hamas and anti-Israel activists have used the civilian deaths to vilify Israel while neglecting to provide the context of the strikes and the makeup of the casualty list.
Perhaps the most known expert in urban warfare and international law when it comes to situations like this is retired US army officer Colonel (reserves) John Spencer who heads up the most prestigious department in the world that is devoted to Urban Warfare at America's West Point Military Academy. Colonel Spencer has visited the Gaza battlefield and has studied the mission briefs extensively and since the outbreak of the war has been adamant that Israel is going above and beyond what is necessary to protect civilian lives in Gaza. In a recent interview with Jordan B. Peterson, Spencer explains just how impressive the IDF effort has been.
Israel is poised to embark on a groundbreaking and contentious plan aimed at reshaping postwar Gaza through the creation of controlled "humanitarian enclaves" or "bubbles." This daring initiative, first reported by The Wall Street Journal over the weekend has ignited a firestorm of debate among political and security analysts, as well as within the international community. The plan, while innovative is not a new concept and many, while openly skeptical, believe if Israel could ensure the security of those in charge of the "bubbles", the long-term prospects for deradicalization within Palestinian society could very well lead to cooperation and peace within the region.
Despite a comprehensive UN-sponsored report from the leading organization on food insecurity revealing that there is no famine in Gaza, the embattled Washington Post headlined an article claiming otherwise. The Post, facing controversy over its steep decline in readership and revenue, opted to emphasize a warning in the report rather than the ultimate conclusion that there is sufficient food in Gaza and that the people are not starving.
